Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MISTURAK v. DEL. COUNTY - JAIL MENTAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2018cv01549
Plaintiff:
RONALD JOHN MISTURAK, JR.
Defendant:
DEL. COUNTY - JAIL MENTAL HOSPITAL, WELFERE SSI-ET STANDTER DISTRICK, CIVIL COURT HOUSE E,T,,O and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil v. Lynch et al
as 1:2018cv00532
Plaintiff:
Jason T. O'Neil
Defendant:
Lynch, John Doe, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNELL v. JANSSEN ORTHO LLC et al
as 3:2018cv04029
Plaintiff:
PATRICK T. O'CONNELL
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MISTURAK v. DEL. COUNTY - JAIL MENTAL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2017cv05276
Plaintiff:
RONALD JOHN MISTURAK, JR.
Defendant:
DEL. COUNTY - JAIL MENTAL HOSPITAL, WELFARE SSI - ET STANDIEN DISTRICK and CIVIL COURT HOUSE E, T, O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOMAR v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01035
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , JOHN E. WETZEL , ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOND v. O'HANLON
as 2:2017cv02962
Plaintiff:
HAKIM BOND
Defendant:
STEPHEN T. O'HANLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor v. National Senior Care Home Health Services et al
as 4:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
James T. O'Connor, Sr.
Defendant:
National Senior Care Home Health Services, Bill McArdle, Robert Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EHRLICH v. MCINERNEY et al
as 1:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN EHRLICH
Defendant:
DENNIS MCINERNEY , ESQ., REMAX WORLD CLASS REALTY, THOMAS W SASAKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. REBER et al
as 2:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
JOSHUA T. REBER, ANTHONY J. BERGER , CHARLES L. CLAYPOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
