Cases 1 - 10 of 18
POSEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11620
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN T POSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: John Burns
as 19-20008
Respondent:
JASON T. POSEY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN C. BURNS
Christopher Johnson v. County of Greenville, et al
as 18-16532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF GREENVILLE, employer of Christopher T. Posey, CHRISTOPHER T. POSEY, attorney, individual and official capacity, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, employer of Karen Ratigan and others
Johnson v. Greenville, County of et al
as 2:2018cv02032
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Greenville, County of, Christopher T Posey, South Carolina, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Posey
as 6:2016cv02453
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antron Young
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Posey
as 1:2014cv00664
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Richard T. Posey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
POSEY et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60977
Plaintiff:
J. T. POSEY and A C & S, INC.
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Posey et al
as 2:2010cv03180
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey, Randy Mr Chambers, Michael R Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Posey et al
as 8:2010cv02982
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey, Steve W Sumner, Susuan W Hugins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Posey et al
as 2:2010cv02982
Plaintiff:
Harold Anderson
Defendant:
Christopher T Posey, Steve W Sumner, Susuan W Hugins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
