Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cameron v. Ellis III et al
as 1:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexander Cameron
Respondent:
T.S. Ellis III, Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria, United States District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Allen v. Ulep et al
as 1:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Nurse Walker, Dr. Benjamin T. Ulep, Nurse Butts and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00453
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, M.L. Counts, J. Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Mario L. Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv03420
Defendant:
S. Sheetz, Solomon Hejirika, A. Edmonds and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tucker Jones v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv03208
Defendant:
Mr. Huff, B. Weaver, K. hansrote and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Tucker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Edmonds v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
Cordero Edmonds
Defendant:
Jarrett, N.L. Leach, Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maggette v. Lee et al
as 5:2017ct03258
Plaintiff:
Shawrun Lee Maggette
Defendant:
Jonathan E. Lee, Justin T. Harrell and T.S. Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Armond v. Gurney et al
as 2:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Arnold De Armond
Defendant:
Patrick J. Gurney, Anton W. Daniel, S. Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Traxler et al
as 2:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Defendant:
William B. Traxler, Paul V. Niemeyer, James Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitfield v. Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2009cv00194
Petitioner:
George R. Whitfield
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections, John M. Jabe, R.C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
