Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tafoya v. Cremer et al.
as 3:2026cv01100
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Tafoya
Defendant:
T. Cremer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2026cv02309
Plaintiff:
Eric Patrick Brandt
Defendant:
Jeremy Tafoya, Colorado Department of Corrections, Cecilia Kear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Tafoya v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv50197
Plaintiff:
Taittiana Martinez-Tafoya
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Snyder v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-2798
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, Judge KRISTON N. HILL, ROBERT E. ESTES and others
Tafoya v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.
as 5:2026cv02356
Plaintiff:
Valerie Tafoya
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Tafoya v. Hendricks
as 3:2026cv00435
Defendant:
Hendricks
Plaintiff:
Chrisopher Alan Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. The Geo Group, Inc et al
as 2:2026cv00662
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Mathis
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc., Lea County Board of Commissioners, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TAFOYA v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv01104
Plaintiff:
ALYSHIA TAFOYA
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
