Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,298
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv02628
Plaintiff: Deputy D.A. Michael Nieto
Defendant: Warden Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. Equinix, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02656
Plaintiff: Wayne Chan
Defendant: Equinix, Inc., Charles Meyers and Keith D. Taylor
Campbell v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff: Taylor A Campbell
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Young v. Bass et al
as 5:2024cv02621
Plaintiff: Gabriel Young
Defendant: Lieutentant Bass, Sgt. Matthew Taylor, Sgt. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2798
Plaintiff: EDWARD BAILEY
Defendant: MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MICHAEL REESE, CPT. ERIC P. SMITH and others
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff: P.C. and M.C.
Defendant: County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor, Schylar Flick and Dywane Russell Crum
Defendant: Oregon Department of Corrections and Eastern Oregon Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Villers
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: P. Villers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Asian Family Market, et al.
as 24-2656
Plaintiff: HENRY JAMES
Defendant: ASIAN FAMILY MARKET, KIVON TAYLOR, C. SUN and others
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff: Michael Nieto
Defendant: Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?