Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saflor v. TEBRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 8:2026cv02645
Plaintiff:
Elmer Saflor
Defendant:
TEBRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lafaille v. Tebra Technologies, Inc.
as 9:2026cv81154
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jimmy Lafaille
Defendant:
Tebra Technologies, Inc. doing business as Tebra / Karco
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LaFaille v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc et al
as 9:2026cv81150
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jimmy Lafaille
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc, TEBRA and Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LaFaille v. Optum Pay, LLC et al
as 9:2026cv81125
Plaintiff:
Jimmy LaFaille
Defendant:
Optum Pay, LLC, United Health Care, TFA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LaFaille v. SFPV, LLC et al
as 9:2026cv81007
Plaintiff:
Jimmy LaFaille
Defendant:
SFPV, LLC, Warren Izzard, Randy Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Joe Martino Counseling, PLLC v. Tebra Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Joe Martino Counseling, PLLC
Defendant:
Tebra Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
HIRSCH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv20735
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
TEBRA HIRSCH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. 3457 Central Ave. NE, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv00412
Plaintiff:
tebra carter
Defendant:
3457 Central Ave. NE, LLC, Defendant ClearCreek Properties, Ltd., Lance Redfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
PRETTO v. ASTRUE
as 3:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
TEBRA PRETTO
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
