Cases 1 - 10 of 589
CLOSNER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
TERRY JAMES CLOSNER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKELY v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Larry Gray Blakley, Sr.
Defendant:
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, SERGEANT Joshua Mabe, Deputy Cody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry v. Brame et al
as 5:2024ct03049
Plaintiff:
Dequante Terry
Defendant:
Sheriff Curtis Brame, Chief Juanita Somerville and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Treece v. Truitt et al
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Catherine Truitt, Andrew Houlihan, Terry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jacobs v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Terry Jacobs
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
WILLIAMS v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
