Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-6972
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ms. L., et al. v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
as 26-6049
Petitioner:
MS. L., MS. C., DORA and others
Respondent:
DAVID J. VENTURELLA, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of ICE, in his official capacity, TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity, RODNEY S. SCOTT, Commissioner of CBP, in his official capacity and others
Akil Childress, et al v. City of Cincinnati, OH, et al
as 26-3825
Plaintiff:
AKIL CHILDRESS, EMMA SUE LONG, CHARLENE BERKHALTER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH, VICE MAYOR JAN-MICHELE LEMON KEARNEY, PRESIDENT PRO TEM VICTORIA PARKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2532
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01583
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv00703
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62446
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-6943
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01733
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
