Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Dijon Townsend v. Nicole Milz, et al
as 24-1293
Plaintiff:
DIJON TOWNSEND
Defendant:
NICOLE MILZ and THE GUIDANCE CENTER
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stampone #713769 v. Michigan Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Julie Clement, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Townsend v. Milz et al
as 2:2023cv12089
Plaintiff:
Dijon Townsend
Defendant:
Nicole Milz, Guidance Center and The Guidance Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carl Bennett v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Warden of Charles Egeler Reception & Guidance Center from 2014 to 2015, in their official and individual capacities,, JOE BARRETT, Warden, of Cooper Street Correctional Facility from 2014 to 2015, in their official and individual capacities and others
Defendant:
MAHENDER MACHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
