Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07244
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lynn v. Brown, et al
as 19-5063
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOES, sued as John Does 1-100, THEODORE RIESLING, an individual a/k/a Ted, KIMBERLY BIEDLER SCHUTZ, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSEMARY ANN LYNN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13985
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00142
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Provident Bank et al v. F/V PATRICIA LYNN II
as 1:2018cv00886
Plaintiff: Pease Development Authority and The Provident Bank
Defendant: PATRICIA LYNN II and F/V PATRICIA LYNN II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
U.S. Small Business Administration v. Provident Bank
as 1:2018cv00736
Plaintiff: U.S. Small Business Administration
Defendant: Provident Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Morris v. Diverified et al
as 1:2017cv06433
Plaintiff: Orrin C. Morris
Defendant: Clardy Diverified, Irene Clardy, Green Choice Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Provident Bank v. Ponce et al
as 1:2017cv21119
Plaintiff: The Provident Bank
Defendant: Carlos M Ponce and Silvia N Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Type: Contract Marine
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC v. FERNANDEZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv09586
Plaintiff: CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant: MARIA LOURDES FERNANDEZ, SAMUEL TOMAS DIPINI, MARIA FERNANDEZ ROSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THE PROVIDENT BANK v. HERING et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05174
Plaintiff: THE PROVIDENT BANK
Defendant: MICHAEL J. HERING and TRACI M. HERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?