Cases 1 - 10 of 1,394
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner:
DENAR ROYAL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner:
DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Cowles, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1689
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D. COWLES, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, STATE OF INDIANA and others
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
FELICIA Y. SHELTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
John Couch v. State of Indiana, et al
as 24-1655
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
TAEBEL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB and ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
REDWINE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. REDWINE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
FIREBRAND MINISTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
