Cases 11 - 20 of 71,825
Herbert Smith v. C. Aviles, et al
as 24-11453
Plaintiff:
HERBERT LENORRIS SMITH
Defendant:
C. AVILES, Lieutenant and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pankey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01102
Petitioner:
Jaycent Pankey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cortez v. USA
as 2:2024cv11202
Petitioner:
Demas Hernandez Cortez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Cornelius J Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Whittaker v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00624
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mitchum v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Seneca Rynell Mitchum
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dwayne Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reed v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02292
Petitioner:
Terry Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
