Cases 41 - 50 of 280
SWITZER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE (PA)
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
KERRY L. SWITZER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE (PA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alcala v. United States Post Office et al
as 1:2022cv02979
Plaintiff:
Luis Alcala
Defendant:
United States Post Office and James Farley Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. United States Post Office
as 1:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
James L. White
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell McCoy v. Agard et al
as 1:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
Da-Shauna Howell McCoy
Defendant:
Joshua Agard, EAN Holdings, Inc., Tameco Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
L. Powers v. United States Post Office
as 22-10580
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L. POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Elizabeth Lopez v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01249
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Lopez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Linda Wright v. USA, et al
as 22-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Defendant:
ARBORS REHABILITATION, -TEXAS, DEXTER GOEI, LONE TREE CONVALESCENT and others
Powers v. United States Post Office
as 1:2022cv20188
Plaintiff:
L Powers
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Cassandra Rodney v. U.S. Postal Office
as 2:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Rodney
Defendant:
United States Post Office and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ward et al v. United States Post Office et al
as 2:2021cv01603
Plaintiff:
Charles Ward and Caron Ward
Defendant:
United States Post Office and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
