Cases
Atkins v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00669
Plaintiff: Thomas H Atkins
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
MUSCIO et al v. INTERGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv63040
Plaintiff: EDWARD MUSCIO and GLORIA MUSCIO
Defendant: INTERGY, INC.
Intervenor_plaintiff: BERGEN BLUESTONE CO., INC. , THOMAS A. ATKINS and WATERTOWN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loffredo et al v. Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. et al
as 5:2010cv14214
Defendant: Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. , State Street Bank and Trust Company, a Massachusetts Trust Company , John Doe and others
Plaintiff: John Loffredo , Charles Acker , Allen D. Adam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
**CASE CLOSED-ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 10-14181.**Loffredo et al v. Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. et al
as 2:2010cv14214
Defendant: Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. , State Street Bank and Trust Company, a Massachusetts Trust Company, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: John Loffredo, Charles Acker, Allen D. Adam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atkins v. Bangs et al
as 2:2010cv00155
Plaintiff: Thomas Claude Atkins
Defendant: Keith Bangs, Neal Walden, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAS-CATH V CURATORS UNIV MISSOURI
as 08-1159
Defendant-Appellee: Angela M. Bennett, Anne C. Ream, Cheryl D.S. Walker and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv05327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
VAS-CATH V CURATORS UNIV MISSOURI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1100
Defendant-Appellee: ANGELA M. BENNETT, ANNE C. REAM, CHERYL D.S. WALKER and others
Plaintiff-Appellant: VAS-CATH INCORPORATED, VAS-CATH INCORPORATED and VAS-CATH INCORPORATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?