Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Two Bulls v. Fluke et al
as 4:2024cv04046
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl Two Bulls
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Marty Jackley and Alex Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04299
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EARL LOYD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Thomas Faulls, Sr.
as 23-4532
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS EARL FAULLS, SR.
Smith v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl Smith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00121
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Criner v. Bowman et al
as 6:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Criner
Defendant:
Helen Bowman, LNU Debbie, Mary Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clarence Shell, Barry Kenneth Abrams, Michael Absher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
