Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Shawn Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JOHNSON v. COMMUNITY LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMUNITY LOAN SERVICING, LLC, SN SERVICING CORPORATION, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00902
Petitioner:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ALLEN v. GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, RONNAL FORD, THOMAS JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nurse Associates, LLC v. Health Trust, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
Nurse Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Healthtrust, LLC d/b/a Mountain Home Health and Rehabilitation Center, Thomas Johnson, Thomas D. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Powers
as 5:2019ct03089
Plaintiff:
Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Cynthia Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Asbell et al
as 5:2016ct03146
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, III, Frank L. Perry, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thompson et al
as 5:2016ct03123
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Thompson, Larry Dail and Frank Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CROWLEY et al
as 1:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIEL CROWLEY, MOFFITT, GREGORY HAYNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Speight et al
as 5:2015ct03188
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Speight, Officer Swinson, Officer Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
