Cases 81 - 90 of 109
EPAC Technologies, Inc. v. Thomas Nelson, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
EPAC Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Counter_plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
EPAC Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Nelson
as 3:2012cv00094
Petitioner:
United States of America and Chris Grimes
Respondent:
Thomas Nelson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Nowicki et al v. Delao et al
as 2:2011cv00514
Plaintiff:
David A Nowicki and Barbara C Tremel
Defendant:
Alice E Delao, Pamela Rasche, Tunisha A Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Albert Marrero Jr et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv06059
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Scott B Cherrin, Richard Joseph, Albert Marrero, Jr and others
Nelson v. Ainsworth et al
as 5:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Nelson
Defendant:
Rick Ainsworth, Blaine County Board of County Commissioners and Judge Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. Zondervan Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson, Inc. and Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Defendant:
Zondervan Corporation and Meredith Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
DEVORAH v. GINGRICH et al
as 1:2009cv01934
Plaintiff:
CARRIE DEVORAH
Defendant:
NEWTON LEROY GINGRICH, THOMAS NELSON, INC. and INTEGRITY MEDIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
