Cases 31 - 40 of 153
DHAFIR v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv00713
Petitioner:
RAFIL DHAFIR
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Perez v. Kane
as 1:2018cv01908
Plaintiff:
Enrique Perez
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fleming v. United States of America, et al.
as 7:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming
Defendant:
United States of America, Jefferson B Sessions, III, Thomas R Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Session et al
as 5:2017cv03364
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Jefferson B Session, III, Thomas R Kane, H Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bailey v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Blake R. Davis, M. D. Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Crespo et al v. Inch et al
as 1:2017cv06329
Defendant:
Kimberly Ask-Carlson, Michael Carvajal, Wayne Decker and others
Plaintiff:
David Crespo, Pedro Espada, Jr., Rolfi Espinal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv01176
Petitioner:
Brian Antwanine Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas R. Kane, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Sullivan et al
as 6:2017cv02696
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
Zachary J Sullivan, Jeff Sessions, James L Robert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
