Cases 11 - 20 of 196
Reice v. Pierce County Judicial System et al
as 3:2023cv05288
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Reice
Defendant:
Pierce County Judicial System, Peter Reich, Craig S Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fatir v. Johns
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Dr. Timothy Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STODIECK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06163
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOHN STODIECK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wiseman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv02216
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Wiseman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Glowner v. Ware et al
as 5:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Glowner
Defendant:
Timothy John Ware and Smith Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
POLLARD SR v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv04570
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOHN POLLARD SR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kung v. Democratic National Committee et al
as 4:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Kin Wah Kung
Defendant:
Democratic National Committee, Ohio Democratic Party, Biden for President, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dobbs v. Morrisey O'Donnell et al
as 3:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Dobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell and Derrick Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Slupski et al v. Pevey et al
as 9:2022cv02695
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Slupski and Vicky Slupski
Defendant:
Terrell Pevey and TD&B Pevey Trucking, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14934
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOHN JACKSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
