Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MCCANN v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 9:2020cv80303
Defendant:
Chattem Inc., GlaxoSmithKline P.L.C., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MCCANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: ZANTAC (RANITIDINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 9:2020md02924
Consolidated Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc. and others
In Re:
Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Joseph Galimidi, Steven Kerzer, Nancy E. Lopez Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Phillips, Isaac Musighi, Julio C. Bernardo and others
Defendant:
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, Apotex Corp., Michael McCandless and others
Counter Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
MCCANN v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv20651
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC,, CHATTEM INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MCCANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCANN et al v. YORK SCHOOL DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Defendant:
YORK SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, JULIE MCCANN and TIMOTHY MCCANN
Plaintiff:
ERIN MCCANN and MICHAEL MCCANN
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
MCCANN et al v. MCQUILLAN et al
as 2:2018cv00018
Defendant:
YORK SCHOOL COMMITTEE, TIMOTHY MCCANN, TOWN OF YORK and others
Plaintiff:
ERIN MCCANN and MICHAEL MCCANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People Of The State Of Illinois v. Washington
as 1:2013cv07566
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of Illinois
Defendant:
Ian Flynn Washington, Mary Karen Simpson, Kane County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hiller v. Amditis et al
as 3:2009cv00334
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hiller and Anthony J. Hiller
Defendant:
Michael Amditis, Timothy McCann and Thomas Elick
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
