Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cameron v. Ellis III et al
as 1:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexander Cameron
Respondent:
T.S. Ellis III, Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria, United States District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jude v. Buchanan County Circuit Court et al
as 7:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Marty Brian Jude
Defendant:
Buchanan County Circuit Court, Sheila Tolliver, Keary R. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Freemasons of Virginia et al
as 4:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Harpoon Larry's, Freemasons of Virginia, Mark Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rashad Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolliver v. Roanoke City
as 7:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Roanoke City
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolliver v. Roanoke City
as 1:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Roanoke City
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolliver v. Ditech Mortgage Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv01009
Plaintiff:
David Tolliver
Defendant:
Ditech Mortgage Corp. and Commonwealth Trustees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton v. Tolliver
as 3:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Carolyn D. Thornton
Defendant:
Robert Earl Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Searle v. DRS Technical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Searle
Defendant:
DRS Technical Services Inc. , DRS C3 & Aviation Company and The Tolliver Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
