Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Taylor v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Hugh A. Taylor
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Marathon Petroleum Company LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gehant v. Crane Co. et al
as 2:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Ingersoll Rand Company, CBS Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Gehant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Newcomb et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Edward Newcomb and Jeanine Newcomb
Defendant:
General Electric Company , Ingersoll Rand Company , Foster Wheeler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-16982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-16864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Appellee:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80124
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
SHAFFER v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv64044
Plaintiff:
DIANA E. SHAFFER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORP. , BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP. and OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORP. and AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY
Thirdparty_defendant:
J.J. DISCH COMPANY , BEARING HEADQUARTERS COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
BABCOCK& WILCOX COMPANY and DIAMOND POWER SPECIALTY COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
