Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Travis Hawkins v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 21-1990
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS HAWKINS
Travis Hawkins v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 19-1719
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS HAWKINS
Travis Hawkins v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 18-10577
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRAVIS HAWKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
HAWKINS v. D.O.C.
as 2:2016cv00885
Petitioner:
TRAVIS HAWKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FAYETTE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS v. JONES
as 4:2016cv00031
Petitioner:
TRAVIS HAWKINS
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28909
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Hawkins and Travis Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
States, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KIM DARNALL, DEBBILYNN DAVILA, JAMIE DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. States, et al
as 13-606
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
MICHELLE STATES, PATRICIA ORDINO, KIM DARNALL and others
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00841
Plaintiff:
Michelle States , Patricia Ordino , Kim Darnall and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
States et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OKW/5:13-cv-00841
Plaintiff:
Michelle States , Patricia Ordino , Kim Darnall and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
