Cases 1 - 10 of 18
USA v. Trevin Nunnally
as 20-14009
Defendant / Appellant:
TREVIN NUNNALLY, a.k.a. Rick
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NUNNALLY v. TIMOTHY et al
as 3:2019cv00308
Plaintiff:
TREVIN NUNNALLY, SR
Defendant:
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE US SUPREME COURT and ELIZABETH TIMOTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunnally, Sr. v. Warden, FPC Maxwell
as 5:2018cv00124
Defendant:
Warden, FPC Maxwell
Petitioner:
Trevin Nunnally, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Trevin Nunnally v. Elizabeth Timothy, et al
as 18-13139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREVIN NUNNALLY
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY, US MAGISTRATE JUDGE, JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, PENSACOLA DIVISION and CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, AS OVERSEER OVER JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES PENSACOLA DIVISION
NUNNALLY v. TIMOTHY et al
as 3:2018cv01424
Plaintiff:
TREVIN NUNNALLY, SR
Defendant:
ELIZABETH TIMOTHY, JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES and CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNNALLY v. TIMOTHY et al
as 3:2017cv00761
Plaintiff:
TREVIN NUNNALLY, SR
Defendant:
ELIZABETH TIMOTHY and CHIEF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNNALLY v. JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES CHIEF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01736
Plaintiff:
TREVIN NUNNALLY
Defendant:
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES CHIEF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNNALLY v. DOE et al
as 1:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
TREVIN NUNNALLY, JR
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and ERIC CAWTHORNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNNALLY v. JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2017cv00346
Plaintiff:
TREVIN NUNNALLY
Defendant:
JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-11650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
