Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Czerner v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Ann Elizabeth Allen Czerner
Defendant:
Kristy A. Smith, Troy Allen Tucker, Joyce Sowards Boggess and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Holmes v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Troy Holmes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holmes v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00274
Petitioner:
Troy Holmes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Casey v. Bare et al
as 5:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Casey
Defendant:
Corporal Hannah Bare, Corporal Pack, Officer Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCumbee v. M Pizza, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Troy McCumbee
Defendant:
M Pizza, Inc., Michael Clise, Margaret Clise and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Holbrook v. Sandy et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tex Gene Holbrook, II
Defendant:
Jeff Sandy, Betsy Jividen, Donnie Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. Ames et al
as 2:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Antwyn Gibbs
Defendant:
Warden Donald Ames, COI Reid, COII Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrell et al v. Barnett Outdoors, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Barnett Outdoors, LLC, Mountain Heritage Outdoors, Inc., Pine Mountain Archery and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Jarrell, Jr. and Kimberly Jarrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Auvil v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 3:2020cv00550
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Auvil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Barker v. Gaylor et al.
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Anthony L. Gaylor, Shaun McClure, City of Charleston and others
Plaintiff:
Johny L. Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
