Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Talley v. McClain et al
as 5:2023cv01280
Petitioner:
Raymond Lawrence Talley
Respondent:
Antonio McClain, Circuit Court of Jackson County, AL and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Talley v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Talley
Defendant:
Bill J Murray, Paul Monk and QCHC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Talley v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Marcilia Talley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Talley v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00694
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Talley, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Talley v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00452
Plaintiff:
Adrian Fitzgerald Talley, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah Toney, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00301
Defendant:
Captain Rogers, Richard Talley and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Taylor Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boone v. Merritt et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jacquees Maurice Boone
Defendant:
Gwendolynn A. Harris, Nicolas Sciachitano, Quintin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
