Cases 1 - 10 of 49
United States of America v. Nineteen Thousand, Eight Hundred Thirty-One ($19,831.00) Dollars in U.S. Currency et al
as 4:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nineteen Thousand, Eight Hundred Thirty-one ($19, 831.00) Dollars in U.S. Currency, Grey Ruger P89 9MM Semi-Automatic Pistol, SN: 315-04234, Silver Taurus PT101 AFS .40 Caliber Semi-Automatic Pistol with Pearl Handle, SN: SOC 57246 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Prosser v. Glo Tanning Centers, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
Glo Tanning Centers, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1 through 3
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MDKC, LLC et al v City of Kansas City, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
MDKC LLC, OZMD LLC, Megan Duma and others
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri, Neighborhood Services Division of Kansas City and Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Katung Tan, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1663
Petitioner:
Katung Petrus Tan, Lili Esther Tan and Sarah Tan
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
TAN Investments, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
TAN Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Allied Waste Services of North America LLC v. Twin Cities Tanning Company LLP et al
as 0:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Allied Waste Services of North America LLC and Allied Waste Services of North America LLC doing business as Republic Services of the Twin Cities - Inver Grove Heights
Defendant:
Twin Cities Tanning Company LLP, Twin Cities Tanning Company L.L.P., Boss Enterprises Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Shelly Ashton et al v. The J.M. Smucker Co. et al
as 4:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
Frederick Tan, Shelly Ashton, Jay Schoener and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, inclusive, The Folger Coffee Co. and The J.M. Smucker Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Frederick Tan v. The Folger Coffee Company et al ***Do Not File in this Case - All filings should be made in 4:21-md-2984***
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
THE FOLGER COFFEE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Frederick Tan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
