Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Autry v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Tanya R Autry
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Parker v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tanya Parker
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Mccoy v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tanya Mccoy
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Schell & Kampeter Inc doing business as Diamond Pet Foods
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dillon v. Higgins et al
as 4:2021cv00809
Plaintiff:
Luther W Dillon
Defendant:
Tanya Higgins and Solomon Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Higgins et al
as 4:2021cv00756
Plaintiff:
Eddie S Watkins
Defendant:
Tanya Higgins, Sparks, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro-Hernandez v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Dale Reed, Tanya Timmons, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Anael Castro-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2020cv02195
Plaintiff:
Tanya Fuller
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rice v. Musslewhite et al
as 4:2020cv01281
Defendant:
Jamie Medlin, Marshall D Reed, Tanya Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Phillip Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragan v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Tanya Ragan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bloodman v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct et al
as 4:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Teresa Bloodman
Defendant:
Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct , Robert Stark Ligon , James Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
