Cases 41 - 50 of 245
Restaurant Management Team Inc. et al v. Eddie's 95th & Stoney Island Grill, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06417
Plaintiff:
Restaurant Management Team Inc. and Restaurant Management Concepts Inc.
Defendant:
Eddie's 95th & Stoney Island Grill, Inc. d/b/a Seashell DriveThru, Muath Albanna a/k/a Mike Albanna and Muath Albanna
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Moore v. Account Resolution Team Inc
as 6:2021cv00967
Plaintiff:
Amanda Moore
Defendant:
Account Resolution Team Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vargas Rodriguez v. The Medical Team, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00500
Plaintiff:
Elka Vargas Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Medical Team, Inc.
Austin v. Land Title Guarantee Company, et al
as 21-1154
Defendant / Appellee:
PACIFIC UNION FINANCIAL LLC, VICKIE L. HARVEY, PARAGON MORTGAGE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY C. AUSTIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
GNCO, INC. et al v. HARMON et al
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
GNCO, INC., TOWLIFT, INC., EAGLE MARK 4 EQUIPMENT CO. and others
Defendant:
BURNS INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. and RYAN HARMON
Jang et al v. Friends Health Care Team, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Friends Health Care Team, Inc. and Rebecca T Cho
Plaintiff:
Soonkum Park and Jae Suk Jang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jang et al v. Friends Health Care Team, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Friends Health Care Team, Inc. and Rebecca T Cho
Plaintiff:
Soonkumm Park and Jae Suk Jang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jang et al v. Cho et al
as 1:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Friends Health Care Team, Inc. and Rebecca T Cho
Plaintiff:
Soonkum PARK and Jae Suk Jang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davidson v. Account Resolution Team Inc
as 5:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Davidson
Defendant:
Account Resolution Team Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
