Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FERRARA v. MONMOUTH COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv04921
Plaintiff:
DENISE FERRARA
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY, MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, SHAUN GOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Haaland
as 22-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jamal Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra Anne Haaland, Secretary of the Dept. of the Interior, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Parker v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv08107
Plaintiff:
Jamal Parker
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berger et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2012cv03621
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Berger
Defendant:
Ted Freeman , Elizabeth Unger and Todd Unger
State Farm Fire and Casualty, et al v. LaFalier, et al
as 10-700
Petitioner:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Respondent:
JOHNNY LAFALIER, PATTY LAFALIER, SAMMY BEETS and others
LaFalier, et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty, et al
as 10-5082
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHNNY LAFALIER, PATTY LAFALIER, SAMMY BEETS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERICAN WESTERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CINNABAR SERVICE COMPANY, INC., VAN TUYL AND ASSOCIATES, J.D. STRONG and others
State Farm Fire and Casualty, et al v. LaFalier, et al
as 10-700
Petitioner:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERICAN WESTERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
JOHNNY LAFALIER, PATTY LAFALIER, SAMMY BEETS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
