Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
USA v. Terry Carroll
as 19-50128
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY CHARLES CARROLL, also known as Terry Carroll
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morgan v. Abbott et al
as 1:2018cv00667
Defendant:
Abel Acosta, Gang Unit Officer FNU Salazar, Terry R. Means and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mulkern v. Browns Performance Motor Cars
as 1:2015cv02292
Defendant:
Browns Performance Motor Cars , Project X, Inc. and Terry Carroll
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mulkern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nathan Smith v. State of Texas, et al
as 13-20263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DICK SCHWARTZ, Esquire (personal and individual capacity), LAW OFFICE OF SCHWARTZ JUNNELL GREENBERG AND OATOUT, ESQUIRE, RON WALKER, Esquire (personal and individual capacity) and others
Nathan Smith v. State of Texas, et al
as 12-20819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, LAW OFFICE OF SCHWARTZ JUNNELL GREENBERG AND OATOUT ESQ, DICK SCHWARTZ, Esquire (personal and individual capacity) and others
Nathan Smith v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00469
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Dick Schwartz , Law office of Schwartz Junnell Greenberg and Oatout Esq and others
Counter_claimant:
Law office of Schwartz Junnell Greenberg and Oatout Esq
Counter_defendant:
Nathan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Smith v. The State of Texas et al
as 2:2011cv06884
Defendant:
Bruce Bennett, Brien O Connor gst non exempt trust, Terry Carroll and others
Personal And Individual Capacity:
Morgan Dunn O Connor
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Terry Carroll Jeffcoat v. 3m, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-81761
Plaintiff:
Terry Carroll Jeffcoat
Defendant:
3m
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
