Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sullivan v. Gaddick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
William L. Sullivan
Defendant:
Lynn Head, Joel Barnes, Terry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Eddie Cook, Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole, Lyn Head and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00791
Defendant:
Clifford Walker, Parole Board Review Committee, Terry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
James Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hambright v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Hambright
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Eddie Cook, Jr., Cliff Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00716
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cook
Defendant:
Derrick Carter, John Crow, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Corizon et al
as 5:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
Terry Davis
Defendant:
Corizon, Stubbs, Barrett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Corizon et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Terry Davis
Defendant:
Corizon, Louis Boyd, Jean Darbouze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camp v. Alabama Telco Credit Union et al
as 2:2012cv02237
Plaintiff:
Rachel Camp
Defendant:
Alabama Telco Credit Union , Dan Austin , Lowell Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Thompson v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2012cv01772
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Thompson
Defendant:
City of Birmingham , A C Roper , Terry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00623
Plaintiff:
Willie Fannette Thompson
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of , A C Roper , Terry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
