Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DIAZ-OTERO v. JOHNSTON et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
LUIS DIAZ-OTERO
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSTON, OFFICER J. JONES and SGT SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Johnston
as 3:2022cv04235
Defendant:
Tedan Surgical Innovations, Inc., Terry Johnston, Tedan Surgical Innovations, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kari Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Carrie Murillo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Carrie Murillo , Michael Murillo , Joseph Hudgins and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carrie Murillo, et al v. Vintage Pharmaceuticals. LLC
as 13-80043
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARRIE MURILLO, MICHAEL MURILLO, a married couple, JOSEPH HUDGINS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS. LLC
Carrie Murillo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv10143
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, AAI Pharma Services Inc, Aaipharma Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Idamae Hudgins, Joseph Hudgins, Jim Hulsey and others
Van Lai v. Kathryn Vanhart, et al
as 10-16732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN KIM LAI, on behalf of herself and her minor daughter A. W.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN VANHART, ROBERT VANHART, ANNA PYZYNA and others
Lai et al v. Vanhart et al
as 5:2009cv05364
Plaintiff:
Van Kim Lai and W. A.
Defendant:
Kathryn Vanhart, Robert Vanhart, Rick Macias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riise v. Johnston et al
as 3:2008cv00419
Plaintiff:
C Michael Riise
Defendant:
Terry Johnston, Stephanie Johnston and Henry N Wooderson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
