Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Thackston v. Wormuth
as 5:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Robert Thackston
Defendant:
Honorable Christine E. Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination on Basis of Disability
Baker v. Sumner County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
Kevin Baker, Marlon Thackston and Caleb Carter
Defendant:
Sumner County Jail and Owen Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thackston v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlon Thackston
Defendant:
Eric Scott Mauldin, David Allen Doyle and Dee Gayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thackston v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12275
Plaintiff:
John Thackston
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THACKSTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv08710
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
LINDA THACKSTON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THACKSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38941
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D THACKSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gresham et al v. Ryder Trucking Company et al
as 1:2019cv05113
Defendant:
James Barbieri, Ryder Trucking Company, Matthew Lewis Baisley and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gresham and Jasmine Batten
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thackston v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00725
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sara M. Thackston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
