Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Le v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Thanh Le
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hung Thanh Le v. Lorraine Caraballo
as 8:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Hung Thanh Le
Defendant:
Lorraine Caraballo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Le v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Nha Thanh Le
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Simmons et al v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maria Simmons, Thanh Le, Timothy Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
BRANDON THANH LE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, MS Contracting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BNSF Railway Company v. Magin et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Pauline Magin, Angelika Salazar, Tiffany Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Le v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03300
Plaintiff:
Thien Thanh Le
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
