Cases 1 - 10 of 213
Hill v. City of Birmingham, The
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brinceton Hill
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rusk et al v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rusk and Mary Frances Rusk
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Water Works Board of The City of Birmingham v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00803
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Chemguard Inc, Kidde PLC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
The Water Works Board of The City of Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Wendie Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Joshua Yates, Danita Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fitzpatrick v. Birmingham, City of
as 2:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Tameka Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 0:2023cv03337
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Patrick D. Smith and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 0:2023cv03081
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Patrick D. Smith and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Patrick D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
