Cases 21 - 30 of 11,314
McGore v. Hood et al
as 2:2024cv10999
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Defendant:
Denise Hood, United States Supreme Court, US Congress and others
Afolayan v. DOJ
as 24-1692
Petitioner:
LISA AFOLAYAN, widow of Nathaniel Afolayan, deceased, on behalf of herself and her two minor daughters
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5087
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Carter v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 24-983
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C. CARTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Welby Cox v. DOJ, et al
as 24-1606
Plaintiff:
WELBY THOMAS COX
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ZACHARY AUGUSTUS MYERS, United States Attorney General
Jack Groenendal v. EOUSA, et al
as 24-5086
Plaintiff:
Jack Alan Groenendal
Defendant:
Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Office of Information Policy, of U.S. Department of Justice, I.C.E. Office of Information, Governance, and Privacy, of the Department of Homeland Security and others
DUDA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
KELLY DUDA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Donald Parsons v. USA, et al
as 24-3297
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. PARSONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Daniel Staszak v. DOJ
as 24-5081
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Staszak
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
JEAN-BAPTISTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
