Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Coriolan v. BIH Express Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Rudolphe Coriolan
Defendant:
BIH Express Inc, Trans-Porte Inc and Keanna Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Marrone et al v. Lamb et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Mason Marrone and Rebecca Marrone
Defendant:
Brenton David Lamb and L & T Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Ahrens v. Hessler et al
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Ahrens
Defendant:
Eric Hessler and Bennett Motor Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Crawford v. Norris et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Steve Crawford
Defendant:
Kevin E Norris and 10 Roads Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Riener et al v. Mikhalchuk et al
as 4:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kim Riener and Paul Riener
Defendant:
Vadzim Mikhalchuk and Mint Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Averitt Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Garcia
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc. and John James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bowman v. Express Mobile Radiology
as 6:2023cv06142
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowman
Defendant:
Express Mobile Radiology
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Kovaci et al
as 4:2023cv04116
Plaintiff:
Victoria Stafford
Defendant:
Sebastijan Kovaci Individually and doing business as BA Express and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
