Cases 31 - 40 of 99
DEVENISH v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03900
Defendant:
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Plaintiff:
JOHN L DEVENISH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Korecky v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 9:2019cv80884
Plaintiff:
Taylre Korecky
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Waters v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 1:2019cv00225
Plaintiff:
Gail Waters
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Peter Albrecht v. National Bancorp Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00810
Plaintiff:
Peter Albrecht
Defendant:
Notional Bancorp Holdings, Inc., National Bancorp Holdings, Inc. and National Bancorp Holdings, Inc. doing business as The Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Korecky v. Discover Bank et al
as 9:2019cv80442
Plaintiff:
Taylre Korecky
Defendant:
Discover Bank, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and USAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willis v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 3:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Minerva Willis
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Watson v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 8:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Watson
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Choate v. USAA Federal Savings Bank et al
as 4:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tera Choate
Defendant:
Doe 1-5 and USAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grante v. USAA Federal Savings Bank et al
as 9:2019cv80034
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company, USAA Federal Savings Bank, USAA Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Steele Grante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
In Re: PETITIONS FOR RELIEF CONCERNING CONSENT ORDER OF FORFEITURE
as 1:2018mc00167
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR.
In Re:
PETITIONS FOR RELIEF CONCERNING CONSENT ORDER OF FORFEITURE
Petitioner:
UBS BANK USA, WILLIAM CLAYTON BATCHELOR, WOODLAWN, LLC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
