Cases 1 - 10 of 9,719
GREGG v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv02679
Plaintiff:
STACY GREGG
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and CAPITOL FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Story et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2024cv02665
Plaintiff:
Michael E Story and Janet M Story
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Sunrise Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fairman v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 8:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fairman
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jackson v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jackson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Freeway Toyota of Hanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Van Kanada v. Ford Motor Co., et al
as 2:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Michael Van Kanada
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Gewek Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Slabaugh v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Rita Slabaugh
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Marlene Cruz Flores v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv03644
Plaintiff:
Marlene Cruz Flores
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ross v. Guildford et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guildford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ross v. Guilford et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patrick Ross
Defendant:
Jonathan Andrew Guilford, Stacie Irving and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
