Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant: Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver: Thomas W. McNamara
The People of the State of New York, by Letitia James v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff: The People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and The People of the State of New York, by Letitia James
Defendant: CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. STRATFS, LLC et al
as 1:2024mc20262
Defendant: STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of The State of New York by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC), et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00040
Defendant: Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Fidelis Legal Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6102 Telemarketing rules
Monticello Village Court, Inc, et al v. Bey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10855
Plaintiff: Monticello Village Court, Inc., Policeman Matthew Rohner and The People of the State of New York (Unidentified Party)
Defendant: Akwa Azeem Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant: NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Commodity Futures v. TMTE, Inc.
as 23-10420
Plaintiff / Appellee: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, State of Alaska and others
Appellee: Kelly Crawford
Appellant: Daniel Bruce Spitzer
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and People of The State of New York
Defendant: Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Roomster Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07389
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, People of The State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant: Roomster Corp., John Shriber, Roman Zaks and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?