Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cave et al v. Thurston
as 4:2018cv00342
Defendant:
Mark Martin and John Thurston
Plaintiff:
Judith Lansky, Susan Russell, Donna Cave and others
Intervenor:
Doug Misicko, Satanic Temple, Lucien Greaves and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Eugene Levy, Gale Stewart, Anne Orsi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Matthew Kezhaya v. City of Belle Plaine
as 22-2183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Satanic Temple
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Belle Plaine, Minnesota
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew A. Kezhaya
The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Lamar Media Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv05033
Plaintiff:
The Satanic Temple, Inc.
Defendant:
Lamar Media Corporation, Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC, Lamar Advantage Holding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
The Satanic Temple v. City of Belle Plaine, et al
as 21-3079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Satanic Temple
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Belle Plaine, Minnesota, Councilman Cary Coop, as City Council Member of the City of Belle Plaine, MN, Councilwoman Theresa McDaniel, as City Council Member of the City of Belle Plaine, MN and others
The Satanic Temple v. City of Belle Plaine
as 21-3081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Satanic Temple
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Belle Plaine, Minnesota
Satanic Temple, Inc., The v. City of Belle Plaine, MN
as 0:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Satanic Temple, The and Satanic Temple, Inc., The
Defendant:
Belle Plaine, City of and City of Belle Plaine, MN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Satanic Temple, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 16-3387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Satanic Temple and Mary Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon, Governor of the State of Missouri and Chris Koster, Attorney General of the State of Missouri
The Satanic Temple et al v. Jeremiah Jay Nixon et al.
as 4:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Mary Doe and The Satanic Temple
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon and Chris Koster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
