Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Toner v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 1:2020cv04258
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company and The Sherwin-Williams Company
Plaintiff:
Randall Toner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ki Ho Yang et al v. Plasti Dip International, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09999
Defendant:
The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California, The Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company, Plasti Dip International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ki Ho Yang, Ko Eun Oh and Keith Yang
Cross Defendant:
Valspar Specialty Paints, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. The Sherwin Williams Company et al
as 1:2018cv10591
Defendant:
The Sherwin Williams Company and Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company USA
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Sluder v. Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 1:2018cv00601
Plaintiff:
Regan Sluder
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company and Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sluder v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 1:2018cv01121
Plaintiff:
Regan Sluder
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and The Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
