Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Ortiz II et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Weldon Murphy, Jimmie Gregory Rogers Jr and Johnny Thomas Ortiz II
Defendant:
Stacy Eggers IV, Kevin N. Lewis, Karen Brinson Bell and others
Amicus Curiae:
North Carolina Republican Party, Representative Destin Hall, Republican National Committee and others
Intervenor:
Dr. Cornel West, Italo Medelius and North Carolina Justice for All Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Bussie v. House Speaker et al
as 5:2021ct03265
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
House Speaker, Webster Earl Britt and Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper, et al v. Lewis, et al
as 5:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
SHAWN RUSH, JOHN BALLA, KATHLEEN BARNES and others
Defendant:
DAVID C BLACK, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KENNETH RAYMOND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, PAUL NEWTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CO-CHAIR OF THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON REDISTRICTING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
WINSTON SALEM - FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP and others
Defendant:
KEN RAYMOND, STELLA ANDERSON, JAY HEMPHILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Common Cause et al v. Representative David R. Lewis et al
as 5:2018cv00589
Plaintiff:
REBECCA JOHNSON, PAULA ANN CHAPMAN, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, Joshua Malcolm, RALPH E HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
