Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Anthony Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt and Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Anthony Anderson, Muhammad Ali Jr., Albuquerque International Support and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steel MMA, LLC et al v. Newsom
as 3:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
The Boxing Club Sport & Fitness, LLC, F45 East Hillcrest, LLC, Crossfit PB, LLC and others
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Wilma J. Wooten, DOES 1 through 100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp
Martushoff v. Luvera, et al
as 2:2018cv01870
Defendant:
County of Skagit, Office of the Attorney General, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Adam S Martushoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Merrill et al v. Mental Health Systems et al
as 3:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
David Merrill , Kiet Le and Benjamin Hill
Defendant:
Mental Health Systems , The Training Center, Jean R. Almonor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010at00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
