Cases 41 - 50 of 14,188
Kenneth Cowles, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1689
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D. COWLES, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Everson et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03320
Plaintiff:
Ebony Everson, Sabrina Everson and Bobby Everson, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Parks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Janar Parks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03257
Plaintiff:
Freddrina Mae Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Government Employees Insurance Company v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03193
Plaintiff:
Governent Employees Insurance Company a/s/o Anita Carton
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Placencia v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Michael L Placencia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 24-1361
Petitioner:
FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TK Hwy 32 Shell Inc v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
TK Hwy 32 Shell, Inc. and TK Hwy 32 Shell Inc
Defendant:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Karalow et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01496
Plaintiff:
Brian Karalow and Catherine Karalow
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
