Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 177
R.M.S. Titanic, Incorporated v. US
as 20-1936
Defendant: D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee: R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
In the Matter of the Complaint of William Martz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00152
Plaintiff: Jane Martz, William Martz, Andrew Horazdovsky and others
Defendant: Betty Barce, Douglas Barce, Darren Barce and others
Trustee: Jacob Alexander Sonneborn
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101
R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. US
as 20-1684
Defendant: D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee: R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
Sambola Hodgson v. Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L., LLC et al
as 1:2020cv22712
Defendant: Voyager Vessel Company, LLC., SEVEN SEAS CRUISES S. DE R.L., LLC d/b/a REGENT SEVEN SEAS CRUISES and Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L., LLC a foreign for profit corporation doing business as Regent Seven Seas Cruises
Plaintiff: Esteban Pedro Sambola Hodgson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Esteban Sambola Hodgson v. Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R. L., et al
as 20-11533
Plaintiff / Appellee: ESTEBAN PEDRO SAMBOLA HODGSON
Defendant / Appellant: VOYAGER VESSEL COMPANY, LLC, A Delaware Corporation and REGENT SEVEN SEAS CRUISES, INC., S. DE R. L., LLC, A Foreign For Profit Corporation d.b.a. Regent Seven Seas Cruises
In the Matter of The Complaint of Under the Bridge Watersports, LLC, as Owner of the 2001 Godfrey Marine Company 22'0" pontoon vessel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01111
Defendant: Micheal Doris, Jr.
Plaintiff: Under the Bridge Watersports, LLC and In the Matter of The Complaint of Under the Bridge Watersports, LLC, as Owner of the 2001 Godfrey Marine Company 22'0" pontoon vessel
Claimant: Christina Dorris, Nathaniel Dorris, Logan Tressler and others
Caleb Garrett v. For Exoneration From or Limita We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35127
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALEB GARRETT, as Owner and Operator of the Crestliner 16-foot Fishing Boat, Vessel Official Number MT3657AV
Defendant / Appellee: FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
Cook et al v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The
as 2:2020cv00080
Plaintiff: Julie Little Taggart, Rodney Jay Vessels and Lynnette Cook
Defendant: Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03863
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bullet Services LLC v. Brown
as 19-3299
Petitioner / Appellant: Bullet Services LLC and Jeffrey Nagler, as Owners and/or Owners pro hac vice of a 1964, 65 foot passenger vessel named "Captain Midnight" for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Not Yet Classified: Ira Brown

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?