Cases 1 - 10 of 2,579
SMITH v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01911
Plaintiff:
DONEZA SMITH
Defendant:
APPLE INC., BEST BUY, BEST BUY CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Best Buy Produce International, Inc. et al v. Produceland And Trading, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03207
Defendant:
Peter Chan, Josephine Tse, Produceland And Trading, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Dynasty Produce & Trading and others
Plaintiff:
Best Buy Produce International, Inc. and JJ Produce And Trading, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Lau Produce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, Estate of George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Palomo v. Best Buy Stores L.P., et al.
as 24-2181
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PALOMO
Defendant:
BEST BUY STORES L.P., DAMIEN PADA, FADI AMMOURI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
