Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. De Hoog v. Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
as 8:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. De Hoog
Defendant:
Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Theo Chocolate Inc
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rockime Davis and MyHang Le
Defendant:
Theo Chocolate, Inc.
Petitioner:
Pamela Chesavage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis et al v. Theo Chocolate Inc
as 2:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Rockime Davis and MyHang Le
Defendant:
Theo Chocolate Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Theo Overstreet et al v. Abbott Cardiovascular Sys Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Theo Overstreet
Defendant:
Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (erroneously sued herein as "Abbott Cardiovascular Sys Inc.", Abbott Cardiovascular Sys Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Chesavage v. Theo Chocolate, Inc.
as 4:2023cv02739
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chesavage
Defendant:
Theo Chocolate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Theo Jones v. City of Oakland
as 23-15340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEO CEDAR JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND
Shorty v. Day and Night Medical Trans Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Theo Shorty
Defendant:
Day and Night Medical Trans Incorporated, Ammar Adam and Unknown Adam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. City of Oakland
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Theo Cedar Jones
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
