Cases 1 - 10 of 307
Melba Ortega v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03687
Plaintiff:
Melba Ortega
Defendant:
a municipal entity COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, an individual KONRAD THIEME and DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv10683
Plaintiff:
Jumaane Jones and Jumaane Amunra Jones
Defendant:
Campbell, Krueger, Rombach and others
Westwood v. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
William B. Westwood
Defendant:
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., Dr. Peter C. Nelligan, Dr. David Mathes and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rettig v. Bendarski et al
as 2:2024cv10298
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rettig
Defendant:
Bendarski, Thiem, Burciaga and others
Rettig v. Bendarski et al
as 2:2024cv10299
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rettig
Defendant:
Bendarski, Thiem, Burciago and others
Thiem et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Linda Thiem and Paul Vermeulen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rhonda Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 23-2204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA J. GORTON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas D. Gorton II, and in her own right
Defendant / Appellee:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, As Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, AMERICAN REFRACTORIES, TA East Penn Refractories, AO SMITH CORP and others
Defendant:
FOSECO INC, GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO, GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO and others
Christopher Thieme v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 23-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER THIEME
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Jimenez v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jimenez
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Thieme v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 22-2498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER THIEME
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
